home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for from:asciilifeform emacs, 92 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

Tue Mar 10 13:44:38 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   mircea_popescu: no dice. spent as little time as did with box because a good chunk of it is replicated in my modern 'emacs' - with which i've made just about everything in my adult life

Sun Mar 08 19:16:59 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   ben_vulpes: if you're unfamiliar with it - autolisp is a 1970s style lisp (complete with unsolved 'funarg problem' !) similar to emacs elisp

Thu Feb 26 16:37:56 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   danielpbarron: fortunately, should you wish to see emacs, there is no need to cross the equator and make your way through the jaguars to the ocelots

Thu Feb 26 16:33:47 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   emacs 'artist-mode' helps

Thu Feb 26 01:07:25 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   emacs is unbeatable on account of the customizations - not only of appearance (i've a different highlighting mode for every type of animal, and most are not the stock included ones) but mechanics - how do folks get along on other editors without 'hungry arrow keys', for example ?

Thu Feb 26 01:01:10 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   ben_vulpes: i enjoy colours, good fonts, etc. and so will not use emacs in a term if there's any choice about it

Thu Feb 26 00:53:54 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   ben_vulpes: i presume the second item on this list was a build of traditional emacs for apple ?

Thu Feb 26 00:49:24 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   mostly trad emacs but with gui hooks for the os

Thu Feb 26 00:49:10 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   iirc the canonical emacs on apple is 'aquamacs'

Thu Feb 26 00:48:02 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   i've only ever used emacs in x11

Sun Feb 15 21:36:40 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   'Other Emacs stakeholders responded with confusion how this could be "a systematic effort to attack GNU packages" and also raised points on how Emacs has support for Microsoft Windows and OS X but wouldn't consider a basic patch for enabling the LLDB debugger to be used. Stallman followed up to say, "These are not similar cases. Neither Windows nor MacOS was intended to push major GNU packages out of use. What I see here appea

Sun Feb 15 21:35:58 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=RMS-Emacs-Gud-LLVM

Sat Feb 14 02:21:21 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   BingoBoingo: everything off by default << not quite true. try building 'xorg' followed by 'emacs' and see end up with dbus, other horrors

Sat Feb 07 03:05:42 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   mircea_popescu: the cl rewrite of emacs, 'climacs', was almost usable

Sat Feb 07 02:23:53 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   most folks who lack the mental flexibility to relearn five or six key commands, would not benefit from emacs, and (if they are aware of its existence at all) - know it. and avoid.

Sat Feb 07 02:22:54 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   yes, it is possible to bolt them onto emacs. but few people do.

Fri Feb 06 05:46:32 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   emacs ?

Wed Jan 21 23:03:28 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   ditto in 'emacs'.

Wed Jan 14 06:18:19 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   ben_vulpes: ever tried http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_mono/ebrowse.html ?

Wed Dec 17 06:08:58 UTC 2014  <asciilifeform>   emacs aficionados! turns out, openbsd has a separate 'emacs21' port, of that version, sans all of the retardation and shitgnomery

« Previous Page    Next Page »